IIRC their argument for on-device scanning was that it was a (largely) privacy-preserving way to comply with existing law. I don’t think they’re insincere if t

IIRC their argument for on-device scanning was that it was a (largely) privacy-preserving way to comply with existing law. I don’t think they’re insincere if they oppose new regulations, yet begrudgingly comply with them if they become law despite their attempts to prevent that. Few people/organizations are willing to die for their principles.