3 ms·
And yet we don’t know everything, so shooting anything not currently explainable down as implausible is even less plausibly right! Not to mention that there’s
by nwienert 3y ago
And yet we don’t know everything, so shooting anything not currently explainable down as implausible is even less plausibly right!
Not to mention that there’s tons of really interesting explanations grounded in science that could explain either scenario.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoJust because it's plausible doesn't make it any less science fiction if we have no evidence it currently exists. We're right back to faeries, writing fiction without proof that anything super/para-normal has even occurred.
- nwienert 3y agoWe're not co-authoring a scientific paper, we're chatting about potential explanations for a variety of disparate but strange reports from various branches of the govt about a variety of recent evidence on UFOs. There's multiple videos released, there's a variety of reports from people who had either first or second hand knowledge. The people are at least somewhat credible (much more than in the past). That's all. Your strong need to gatekeep the conversation is odd, I'm not even making any strong claim just throwing out far-out implausible options, acknowledging them as such. It shouldn't be hard to have informal conversation exploring new possibilities without a scientist pre-approving the topic. It's just an internet forum discussion thread on a weird UFO story.