5 ms·

> No. They appeared to put in this effort To be clear – you are saying this was an easy thing for Apple to construct? > but at the end of the day they built a

> No. They appeared to put in this effort To be clear – you are saying this was an easy thing for Apple to construct? > but at the end of the day they built a system which could be used for scanning any file on your device for any reason This is factually untrue and also not in contrast to the amount of effort they put in. > And then of course the fact that if anything was deemed innapropriate it would have been submitted to their own verification centre where someone would actually physically look at your pictures and then forward them to law enforcement This is also factually incorrect. Did you read the technical documentation Apple published?

gambiting 3y ago
>>To be clear – you are saying this was an easy thing for Apple to construct? No. >>This is factually untrue and also not in contrast to the amount of effort they put in. How so? I fail to see how this system has anything that would prevent it from being used to scan any file on the device? Sure their design is only for pictures, but why would it be limited to them? >>This is also factually incorrect. It's not, that is exactly what their technical paper says. >> Did you read the technical documentation Apple published? I did, multiple times, I've been having these arguments for a long time now.