3 ms·
You need to consider what threat you are defending against. Before credit cards were popular, it was common for aircraft passengers to be armed with handguns a
by Duff 15y ago
You need to consider what threat you are defending against.
Before credit cards were popular, it was common for aircraft passengers to be armed with handguns and carrying a lot of cash -- yet there were few incidents. Think about that.
An organization planning an operation against any nation-state relays on secrecy and anonymity to function, period. That is what random screenings will help combat.
The current TSA regime is really trying to stop crazy people. I believe there is some documentation to establish that they are somewhat successful at that too. The problem with the TSA approach is that they are too big to be competent at what they do, and the near universal contempt that they are held in hurts that mission -- even deranged people hunk the TSA is dumb.
- Joeri 15y agoYou don't stop crazy people by strip-searching them. You stop them by asking them questions to detect the crazy ones. The TSA focuses on the mechanism instead of the person, and that never works. There's a reason israel's airports are safe from terrorism, and it's not because of fancy body scanners.
- Duff 15y agoTrue. The problem with that approach in the US is that our laws demand an "objective" approach to dealing with this stuff. We don't trust police to make subjective decisions.