4 ms·
Many of the best physicists I guess argue for fairies as well. In the context of many US government military officers and senators confirming evidence of fairy
by nwienert 3y ago
Many of the best physicists I guess argue for fairies as well. In the context of many US government military officers and senators confirming evidence of fairy like vehicles.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoNo, at best they say they see stuff they can't identify. Throughout all this there are claims that someone somewhere has real evidence but it never materializes. You're taking that credible observational claim and running with it until you end up with alternate dimension creatures. I'm just saying - if we're going to make a bunch of unsubstantiated sci-fi claims fairies seem just as likely.
- nwienert 3y agoI didn’t argue for it or make any claim, you’re way distorting what I said which is just that shooting down the simplest form of alien arguments doesn’t shoot them all down, and offered two. The many-worlds quantum interpretations have many curious advocates within physics. There are now multiple senators and high level military officers confirming this explicitly as well, so that’s also wrong on your part.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoYou offered science fiction and act like that makes it more plausible when the table stakes of "was what was observed outside of the realm of normal?" haven't even been satisfied. I think it's faeries. We're at an impasse. Multiple senators and high level military officers are bringing in material evidence?
- nwienert 3y agoOne of my scenarios was inter dimensional entities. The other was just sufficiently advanced tech. It’s funny you ad hominem the first one and ignore the second.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoWell, because imaging sufficiently advanced tech without evidence that it exists or is even plausible is literally science fiction.
- nwienert 3y agoAnd yet we don’t know everything, so shooting anything not currently explainable down as implausible is even less plausibly right! Not to mention that there’s tons of really interesting explanations grounded in science that could explain either scenario.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoJust because it's plausible doesn't make it any less science fiction if we have no evidence it currently exists. We're right back to faeries, writing fiction without proof that anything super/para-normal has even occurred.
- nwienert 3y agoWe're not co-authoring a scientific paper, we're chatting about potential explanations for a variety of disparate but strange reports from various branches of the govt about a variety of recent evidence on UFOs. There's multiple videos released, there's a variety of reports from people who had either first or second hand knowledge. The people are at least somewhat credible (much more than in the past). That's all. Your strong need to gatekeep the conversation is odd, I'm not even making any strong claim just throwing out far-out implausible options, acknowledging them as such. It shouldn't be hard to have informal conversation exploring new possibilities without a scientist pre-approving the topic. It's just an internet forum discussion thread on a weird UFO story.