5 ms·

My only complaint with 2003 was screen resolutions. Otherwise I find that theme to be beautiful and more importantly, functional. You can cleary and quickly ide

My only complaint with 2003 was screen resolutions. Otherwise I find that theme to be beautiful and more importantly, functional. You can cleary and quickly identify which window has focus, there are clear borders seperating one application for another. If my comment isn't making it clear, I absoluetly HATE "modern" flat interfaces. >I have two windows side-by-side with a little overlap, I can't figure out where one ends and the other starts. >I can't quickly tell which window has focus, because the focus indicators are some little tiny graphical detail. >Some applications (/cough/ chrome) go out of their way to break OS standards. Like merging the tab-bar into the title bar, or hiding the tab-history icon over by the window control icons.

yonatan8070 3y ago
You can set both Chrome [1] and Firefox [2] to use Server Side Decorations (SSD) instead of Client Side Decorations (CSD), this will make it use the system title bar and frame like you want. [1] https://askubuntu.com/questions/1365609/how-to-enable-system-title-bar-in-chrome-to-make-it-visible-on-every-workspace https://askubuntu.com/questions/1365609/how-to-enable-system... [2] https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-remove-firefox-title-bar-on-linux https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-remove-firefox-title-bar-on-l... (this article is about how to disable it but the idea is the same)
JohnFen 3y ago
I agree with this entirely. User interfaces in general have become harder to use and, if I may say subjectively opine, uglier. Both with Linux and most other OSes and applications.