3 ms·
It is bad for society as a whole - it prioritizes the interests of citizens of one country. That's all countries are - groups of people competing against each
by stcroixx 3y ago
It is bad for society as a whole - it prioritizes the interests of citizens of one country. That's all countries are - groups of people competing against each others. There are winners and losers. I'm fine with this. It allows countries the freedom to run things according to their values and sink or swim accordingly.
- mrtksn 3y agoWhy don't you limit other subgroups for your advantage? Women used to be like that but it's not cool anymore. People from certain race used to be limited for the advantage of another race but it's not the case anymore. Why just don't drop all these shenanigans and adopt a meritocracy? A meritocracy will yield a much better society where you won't need to be from the privileged class to have a good life.
- stcroixx 3y agoThat would go against the majorities preference within my country where everyone is equal under the law. Other groups of people in other places may feel differently in their sovereign nations. There is no global authority here to resolve these kinds of disputes or impose it's will on those nations.
- mrtksn 3y ago> everyone is equal under the law Apparently not. If that was the case, you would have equal punishment for equal crimes.