5 ms·
I consider several Pixar movies to be “masterpieces”. The production quality is so high, the cast and voice acting are so good, and the story is able to appeal
by freetime2 3y ago
I consider several Pixar movies to be “masterpieces”. The production quality is so high, the cast and voice acting are so good, and the story is able to appeal to adults and young children alike.
High art they are not, but I don’t think that “masterpiece” should be reserved only for high art. The credits in Pixar movies are filled with people who masters at their craft.
In terms of animation, I personally hold Studio Ghibli in higher regard. But they are targeting a different audience with more adult themes. And I wouldn’t hesitate to apply “masterpiece factory” to either studio. Compare either studio to DreamWorks and the difference in quality is noticeable in just about every aspect of the production.
- lloeki 3y ago> Studio Ghibli ... are targeting a different audience with more adult themes Definitely for the "adult" theme part, although I'd word it differently. While the likes of Mononoke Hime and Grave of the Fireflies should probably be handle with care (resp. violence and very heavy context) most are perfectly watchable by children (of course being mindful of what may shock or otherwise create psychological harm). I'd argue that many of these "adult" themes are perfectly graspable by children and it's our own prejudice that we project, and that these films present them in an accessible way for children, enabling deep parent-child discussions that would help understand and structure a child and prepare them for their life to come. I'd rather have my children watch Ghibli stuff than Disney.
- freetime2 3y agoTo clarify, by “adult themes” I didn’t mean that they aren’t suitable for children. Just they didn’t really hold my kids’ interest. I watched a bunch of Studio Ghibli movies with my kids when they were age 4 - 6 or so. Spirited Away, Totoro, Kiki’s Delivery Service, Castle in the Sky, and Nausicaa. The pacing is quite a bit slower, and the action more subdued than in Pixar movies and other animation targeted at kids. My kids tended to gravitate toward Pokemon, Crayon Shin-chan, Doraemon, and other animation aimed at kids - which I don’t really have any problem with. Also Demon Slayer and One Piece - which we probably shouldn’t let them watch - but they seemed to handle it ok. And finally YouTube, which is mostly trash, but we tolerate in moderation. I would definitely be happy if they showed more interest in Ghibli movies - but it’s hard to compete with endorphin rush of YouTube.
- aidenn0 3y agoTotoro and Kiki were both beloved by my kids. 4 might be a bit young, but certainly at 6. My wife, on the other hand, finds them unwatchable.
- hylaride 3y agoGhibli movies I've found are more like entering a state of mind or emotion than following a plot. I'm not sure if that's a Ghibli thing or a Japanese thing (I haven't watched much other Japanese content). We introduced Totoro when my kid was 3.5 and it was too soon (she'd cry at the end because the cat bus was going away), but that movie along with Kiki's Delivery Service, The Secret World of Arrietty, and Ponyo have since become staples in our home. As a parent to a daughter, I do really like the strong female leads that most of their movies have.
- jvvw 3y agoMy children have found most of the Studio Ghibli films unsettling and slightly scary. They watched them I guess when they were in the 6-10 age range and saw My Neighbour Totoro, Spirited Away, Ponyo, Howl's Moving Castle etc. They refuse to watch Studio Ghibli films these days! I'd much rather watch them than Disney but they somehow couldn't cope with them.