4 ms·
In the case of LLMs, I really wish we would stop referring to models where the source code and/or weights were leaked as "open source". Likewise, for those whe
by DebtDeflation 3y ago
In the case of LLMs, I really wish we would stop referring to models where the source code and/or weights were leaked as "open source". Likewise, for those where they were deliberately released but the license restricts them to "non-commercial use" or allows commercial use so long as the use "does not compete" with the company that released them.
- hospitalJail 3y agoYep, first I got nailed with aGPL trying to make embedded products. But hey, I can work around that.... Then OpenAI and GPT3 was a wakeup call that releasing code to view is not the 'end all'. Then Facebook and llama, was a final straw of annoyance. MIT/Apache/GPL or bust. If you use those, you are a person of high class.
- cookieswumchorr 3y agofor the leaked part yes. But the license can be whatever, even proprietary, if the source is disclosed it is open-source