5 ms·
It’s interesting to note that in Akron, Ohio in 1950 (a medium sized industrial city at a population of around 350,000) a city home like the Sears home would ha
by jschveibinz 3y ago
It’s interesting to note that in Akron, Ohio in 1950 (a medium sized industrial city at a population of around 350,000) a city home like the Sears home would have sold for around $8,000. Assuming the land at 1/3 the cost and a 1/4 acre lot, the land would have been worth about $2,500. With inflation, that lot should cost about $31,500 today.
According to [1], the median cost of 1/4 acre in Akron in 2020 was around $25,000. To be fair, Akron does not have the economic advantages of the industrial 1950’s any longer, but the price is still close to the expected value from inflation.
What has changed are people’s expectations. Today, a Sears home on a 1/4 acre lot is not what people dream about owning. Nevertheless, it is indeed still an option throughout the middle of the US, and once the people on the coast get hungry enough for their own home, they will move inland, do remote work and live very comfortably.
[1] Zillow—via Sage AI
- ehnto 3y agoA lot in the middle of nowhere is what people don't want, hence why it's cheap. House pricing in the popular areas is perverted by speculative investment and shitty zoning, which are issues that still need solving. It could be much cheaper, then people don't have to move out to the middle of nowhere. We just need to get better at accommodating affordable city living.
- coding123 3y agoMany people want to move to the middle of nowhere, despite not having a Chipotle, because they are sick of traffic.
- mulmen 3y agoHuh. Strange that our perceptions are so different. I associate fast food with "the middle of nowhere". Part of why I like living in the city is that I don't have to eat at Chipotle.