4 ms·

While I like the concept of the open maps idea and I'm sure it has a bright future, what about aerial views, street view, etc? Is this not a functionality step

by 51Cards 15y ago

While I like the concept of the open maps idea and I'm sure it has a bright future, what about aerial views, street view, etc? Is this not a functionality step backwards for FourSquare hopping on such a new service at this point? The biggest problem I see with MapBox right now is that their map labels don't seem to be dynamic. There are a lot of places around my house I can zoom in and I have to pan to see the street name because the label is out of view. There is one location nearby where I can scroll 3/4 the way across town and not see a label on one particularly major street. This could quickly make for a frustrating user experience. Don't get me wrong, I applaud what MapBox is putting together and I'm sure it'll improve rapidly. At this point though it does seem like a significant drop in functionality for a major service to move onto it.

tmcw 15y ago
> The biggest problem I see with MapBox right now is that their map labels don't seem to be dynamic. As far as I know, there's only one map where labels _are_ dynamic - Google MapsGL, and it's available only on 10% of browsers. > While I like the concept of the open maps idea and I'm sure it has a bright future, what about aerial views, street view, etc? Is this not a functionality step backwards for FourSquare hopping on such a new service at this point? FourSquare wasn't using street view, but the satellite imagery void is definitely something to address.
- abraham 15y ago
  Based on the system requirements MapsGL should be available much more than 10% of browser. WCIU... pegs "partial" WebGL support at 46%. Evan if you remove a generous % for lack of hardware support you are still significantly over 10%. http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1630790 http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answe... http://caniuse.com/#search=webgl http://caniuse.com/#search=webgl
jorgeortiz85 15y ago
Disclaimer: I work for foursquare. In some ways it's better, in some ways it's worse. In the long-term though, we feel that this is the right move. OpenStreetMap and MapBox will be improving continuously, and with open data we can drive those improvements in ways that we couldn't with Google data. I've been following OpenStreetMap since it launched, and its really a testament to how far its come in the last 7 years that it's good enough to be used in major consumer websites. In many ways, this is an effort that dwarfs Wikipedia in size, complexity, and ambition. We're excited to be making use of open data, and will be even more excited to start contributing back in the near future.

by 51Cards 15y ago

tmcw 15y ago

> The biggest problem I see with MapBox right now is that their map labels don't seem to be dynamic. As far as I know, there's only one map where labels _are_ dynamic - Google MapsGL, and it's available only on 10% of browsers. > While I like the concept of the open maps idea and I'm sure it has a bright future, what about aerial views, street view, etc? Is this not a functionality step backwards for FourSquare hopping on such a new service at this point? FourSquare wasn't using street view, but the satellite imagery void is definitely something to address.

abraham 15y ago
Based on the system requirements MapsGL should be available much more than 10% of browser. WCIU... pegs "partial" WebGL support at 46%. Evan if you remove a generous % for lack of hardware support you are still significantly over 10%. http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1630790 http://support.google.com/maps/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answe... http://caniuse.com/#search=webgl http://caniuse.com/#search=webgl

jorgeortiz85 15y ago

Disclaimer: I work for foursquare. In some ways it's better, in some ways it's worse. In the long-term though, we feel that this is the right move. OpenStreetMap and MapBox will be improving continuously, and with open data we can drive those improvements in ways that we couldn't with Google data. I've been following OpenStreetMap since it launched, and its really a testament to how far its come in the last 7 years that it's good enough to be used in major consumer websites. In many ways, this is an effort that dwarfs Wikipedia in size, complexity, and ambition. We're excited to be making use of open data, and will be even more excited to start contributing back in the near future.