Either your reading comprehension is terrible, or your selective quoting is intentional and your motives ethically ambiguous. The full quote you are referring t

Either your reading comprehension is terrible, or your selective quoting is intentional and your motives ethically ambiguous. The full quote you are referring to is this: "She swears by her Zune, and having used both it and the iPod, the Zune is far and away a better device on every front. Having said that, the iPhone's interface is just that much better - and has the benefit of in-depth integration with third party devices." Within that quote, I say that the Zune is better than the iPod, and the iPhone better than the Zune. I illustrated this very simply just two lines before that one. There is no contradiction at all. By asking which is it, you are intimating a dichotomy where a trichotomy was actually in play. I'll restate more clearly, and in greater detail: For playing music from my library, I believe the Zune is a superior device when compared to the iPod, however having come to own an iPhone, I prefer the iPhone to the Zune - with respect to playing music from my library.