3 ms·
I suppose it’s open to interpretation whether that is deceptive. It seems like it’s accurate even if there is other context. Personally I’m in favor of pretty b
by TaylorAlexander 3y ago
I suppose it’s open to interpretation whether that is deceptive. It seems like it’s accurate even if there is other context. Personally I’m in favor of pretty broad federal land protections.
- throwway120385 3y agoSame here. Especially as the alternative of waiting for damage to be done has historically meant that the water is entirely undrinkable for generations and the mining or oil company has bankrupted itself and the owners have skipped town.
- sacrosancty 3y ago[dead]
- hoosier_daddy 3y ago[flagged]
- scythe 3y ago>Personally I’m in favor of pretty broad federal land protections. I'm generally in favor of broader protections than the Court permitted with this decision. However, determining what policies are appropriate is simply not in the remit of the Court. SCOTUS determines what the law says, not what it should say.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]