> I think history is a bit more complex than that. I am introducing that complexity. It is the article that omitted it to tell a simple bad guys oppressing goo

> I think history is a bit more complex than that. I am introducing that complexity. It is the article that omitted it to tell a simple bad guys oppressing good guys tale. > 1492 Spain as such didn’t exist. The Moors invaded the Visigoths! It was no more a rightful invasion that what the Visigoths themselves did when Rome fell. So you should have no trouble or qualms justifying the colonization of the Americas or India using that same logic, correct? It's strange how fluid and complex identity is in some cases, but straightforward in others. The Alhambra decree wasn't passed by "Spain" either, but by Castile and Aragon, yet we have no trouble drawing a line between these entities, at least when we want to assign blame.