2 ms·
On one hand that seems like transparent ass-covering to me, but on the other companies should be free to engage in transparent ass-covering. These are for-profi
by EA-3167 3y ago
On one hand that seems like transparent ass-covering to me, but on the other companies should be free to engage in transparent ass-covering. These are for-profit institutions, their duty is to their shareholders, not social causes they barely pay lipservice to. When it was in their interest to vocally support drag shows, they did, and now that it isn't in their interest, they aren't.
That's the reality of these companies, and also why no one should look to them for moral guidance.