4 ms·
If you think it's so obvious, why don't you provide the answer? I don't think GP would have posted the question if it were obvious to them. Whether you talk ab
by lucb1e 3y ago
If you think it's so obvious, why don't you provide the answer? I don't think GP would have posted the question if it were obvious to them.
Whether you talk about Microsoft-the-firm or Microsoft-the-shareholders when asking about "what's in it for them": that's the same thing because it's a for-profit business, so that's an irrelevant thing to post as well.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- wvenable 3y ago[flagged]
- gigel82 3y agoI think the point (which I agree with) is this doesn't benefit Microsoft at all. It benefits a VP by them being able to show some metric move from Q to Q, and get a fat bonus. They couldn't care less about the long term effect on Microsoft's PR / reputation (they'll likely skitter off after collecting a few of those bonuses either rest&vest with some D&I initiative, or move off to the next victim to suck from).