The person he's replying to seems to have a faily clear definition of wokeism. He think "wokeism" is what the American establishment use to undermine Trump: >

The person he's replying to seems to have a faily clear definition of wokeism. He think "wokeism" is what the American establishment use to undermine Trump: > NYT is transitioning from wokism to statism. > Because the US establishment doesn’t want domestic chaos anymore. They’re in control. > So you’ll see less riots calling for abolishing police, more funding for riot police. > Less on toxic masculinity, more on troops for foreign wars. Which is refreshingly clear, even if just as out of touch with any kind of recognisable reality as most invocations of "woke" from the right.