3 ms·

You do realize that many, if not most, humans would fail this test, right?

• TheOtherHobbes 3y ago
  AGI is competing with human culture as a whole. Individual humans are not exactly the best of all possible tests for AGI.
• kayodelycaon 3y ago
  Yes, but humans as a group can do it. An AGI needs to show a similar number of AGIs can do the same given the same starting template. The AGI will need to look at all of the tasks written, determine what the success criteria is, and then combine that that into a single set of answers. With the instructions in human-readable form, not machine readable. It can use as many or as few AGIs as it needs to accomplish this. It's the same as if we gave these instructions to a human with sufficient skill and resources to delegate.
• famouswaffles 3y ago
  Yes you'll find that any testable definition of AGI that has not been passed yet would be unpassable for a big chunk of the human population. In other words, General, Artificial and Intelligent have been passed. That's why a few papers/researchers opt to call these models "General Artificial Intelligence" instead https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2806457 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/28064... https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12003 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12003 Or some such variant like "General Purpose Technologies" as Open AI did. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130 since "AGI" has so much baggage with posts shifting at the speed of light.