3 ms·
The problem is much harder than arguing against a "panacea". That's a classic straw-man – it's very rare for somebody to actually believe a new tool will solve
by wilg 3y ago
The problem is much harder than arguing against a "panacea". That's a classic straw-man – it's very rare for somebody to actually believe a new tool will solve "all their problems". The difficulty is you might find a tool that could solve many of your problems but has trade-offs. Some of which are foreseeable and some which are not. Predicting and weighing those is the hard part, not disabusing people of the notion of a perfect solution.