3 ms·

> We have a word for this, it's "tweeting". Ok, then you should know that your response was also tweeting, given that definition.

• Chris2048 3y ago
  I think it was humour, but the issue is that it's easy to conflate.
• coldtea 3y ago
  It was a second order observation, so doesn't need to also include itself.
  • meepmorp 3y ago
    It was the same kind of silly pseudo-pithiness, though.
    • coldtea 3y ago
      Perhaps, but in this case it was also true.