4 ms·
> [0] https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/topics/blob/main/ https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/topics/blob/main/... Nice v1 at the end. We can a
by josefx 3y ago
> [0] https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/topics/blob/main/ https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/topics/blob/main/...
Nice v1 at the end. We can assume that this list is final and will not be changed?
> nor (by policy) other kinds of sensitive PII.
Yeah, it just exposes interest in family planing, loans, ..., which we do know have absolutely no potential for abuse.
Or given the attempts to outlaw drag there is probably no potential way to use interest in Nail Care or Makeup in a negative fashion, right?
> Yes, if you assume the people who designed this API were idiots
I assume they are getting paid well to play the role.
- stavros 3y agoI don't disagree with your argument, but I think you're making it in a way that's tautological, and a bit disingenuous. You're saying "this API has privacy concerns" and then point to some privacy concerns. However, you aren't taking into account that it's not this specific API that has privacy concerns. Any advertising API would have privacy concerns, because it's explicit goal is to be able to target users for ads. Pointing to some stuff and saying "this API that's made to target users allows user targeting" isn't bringing anything new, really.