The speech focuses on more than the MIC and he mentions other dangers such as changes to scientific development. The archives.gov page should do more analysis o

The speech focuses on more than the MIC and he mentions other dangers such as changes to scientific development. The archives.gov page should do more analysis on it. The interests in the MIC lines distorts the underlying message of the speech, which is that the changes the US underwent during Ike's presidency had major risks/failure modes, that though Ike thought necessary and developed vigorously, he would also not be able to help with going forward, and that it would require the American people to guard against those risks. To "Use my work justly." It only took two years for the US to struggle with the changes he helped bring about, in which a lesser president risked nuclear war to save political face. Reminds me very much of Johnny's "Can we survive technology?", letter in harper's, written while he was dying. https://geosci.uchicago.edu/~kite/doc/von_Neumann_1955.pdf https://geosci.uchicago.edu/~kite/doc/von_Neumann_1955.pdf Ike is also very particular with words and has several other good speeches. I like the "multiplicity of fears" section of his speech in 54. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-353 https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-new... This is also an interesting read of Eisenhower's speech's from an Australian student's perspective and also raises details of his presidency that are often forgotten. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Ideal-America(n)%3A-Dwight-Eisenhower's-elusive-Couacaud/1fa23d2caa16e6399d0d08fc74ced880bae94e61 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Ideal-America(n)%3...