5 ms·

tbh, at this point, I'd argue that not supporting arm is a bad business move. There are decent ARM router boards out there. They could likely do well selling o

• ZeroSolstice 3y ago
  You could be right but thats a big gap between "could likely do well selling..." and actually having a market and reliable customers. What if thats not their business model? What if it requires hiring or finding a dedicated ARM developer? What about security? If a zero day comes out now what you have (3) different architectures to support and test. Even if they offered it as a supported solution would most of the people complaining fund the work through support. Probably not, because they expect the software to just "work" for them, for free. I looked through the forum on one of the first ARM[1] posts and as expected (2) pages in and it becomes a tech support thread for people who want to try the latest but be handed the answers. For a project where they document[2] the development workflow, architecture, and environment its a bit difficult to understand the complaints when its opensource. Clone the repo and get to work. [1] https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=12186.0 https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=12186.0 [2] https://opnsense.org/developers-invitation/ https://opnsense.org/developers-invitation/