5 ms·

Cool stuff. The possibilities of Minecraft if some optimisation work was done would be amazing. It's demotivating just how rotten the internals of Minecraft are

• tehbeard 3y ago
  Plenty play bedrock. It's just.... a very sanitized and corporate experience. And for Java edition players just different enough in mechanics / ux / feel to annoy them. Very much pushes you to stick to official servers or small friend groups, and is quite aggressive on its monetization.
  • circuit10 3y ago
    Bedrock is also much harder to mod, being written in C++, and mods are a big part of what people like about Minecraft. They have an add-on system but that's just fancy JSON config files so you can only do things like adding a new block, not complete reworks of the internal code to improve performance or anything like that which is totally possible on Java Edition
• aprilnya 3y ago
  Bedrock gives me an uncanny valley feeling… it’s Minecraft, sure, but everything is just slightly off, and it makes my brain really not like it
• Pannoniae 3y ago
  Bedrock rendering performance is really good. Tick performance? Not so much, the game is riddled with horrible issues such as world fallthrough which don't exist on Java (due to floating-point rounding errors), and I think the default tick distance is something like 4 or 6 chunks. Bedrock looks good, but the simulation itself is just broken. Not to mention the uncanny feeling as previous posters said - they've managed to create a similar game but with a sterilised, odd feeling. It's like watching a bad Disney adaptation of a book.