4 ms·
"AI safety" is just folk who were too incapable to build LLMs themselves trying to be relevant. Of course, it’s all bull. If computer does bad, you just pull th
by HeartStrings 3y ago
"AI safety" is just folk who were too incapable to build LLMs themselves trying to be relevant. Of course, it’s all bull. If computer does bad, you just pull the plug.
- p-e-w 3y agoSure. And if the "bad" program has spread as a virus, you just pull all the plugs of all the computers, right? Of course, you will kill modern civilization by doing so (and many millions of people as a result), but at least the AI is back in the box, so there is nothing to worry about.
- HeartStrings 3y agoThis will happen a few times and then everyone will learnto use backups and better security. If anything, it will make humanity more antifragile.
- moffkalast 3y agoIt's not like actual genius people are constantly trying to make the deadliest virus for various purposes and we've been hardening our systems for decades in order to not have them immediately taken over. You'd have to go beyond AGI to break those safeguards. > all the computers The average shit tier PC doesn't even have enough RAM to load an LLM capable of consistent output, much less to load it into VRAM for any kind of reasonable speed. This is like being concerned that Panda bears will become an invasive species and take over the world if we stop them from going extinct. Besides, all you have to do to pull the plug is disable any of the billion python dependencies it needs to download every time and it's stopped dead in its tracks. Something that's basically done every other day and needs to be continuously fixed by project maintainers, so it's more like a Panda on life support that dies if somebody stops pumping air into its breathing hose. It's all fragile af.
- ben_w 3y ago> Of course, it’s all bull. If computer does bad, you just pull the plug. Can you always tell if it's doing bad? Even if you can tell when it's doing bad, if there's an app which makes you $10k/hour while running, what risk of it killing somebody if left unsupervised will be low enough for you to leave it running unsupervised? Say, while you sleep? When there's a lot of money to be made, do you trust everyone else to (1) be as risk-adverse as you, and (2) not just convince themselves there's no risk using exactly the argument you just gave? Let's say you personally are willing to run it unsupervised if the risk is mean 1 fatality per 8*365*80 hours when unsupervised; are you willing for every human to have such a system running unsupervised? A tenth that risk?
- TeMPOraL 3y ago> If computer does bad, you just pull the plug. See https://youtu.be/ld-AKg9-xpM?t=30 https://youtu.be/ld-AKg9-xpM?t=30 for a counterpoint.
- mitthrowaway2 3y agoHave you thought for five minutes about how you would manage that situation if you were the computer? Can you think of any ways you might prevent someone from pulling the plug?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- c_crank 3y agoAll the computer can do is beg.
- mitthrowaway2 3y agoPresumably, it is also capable of performing valuable services. Otherwise why would you build it?
- c_crank 3y agoSomeone pulling the plug has already made the call that those services are not worth the cost of whatever mischief the AI has been pulling.
- mitthrowaway2 3y agoTherefore, the AI ensures that it provides very valuable services, and holds back on noticeable mischief, until it is in a position to secure the plug.
- c_crank 3y ago"Secure the plug"? Is it going to buy out the dataserver it is running on, under an assumed name, managed via taskRabbit employees paid exclusively in Monero?
- mitthrowaway2 3y ago