3 ms·
E-bikes are neither commute vehicles (not confortable to sit on) nor sport equipments (whose utility is to improve public health). They're just hobbyist tech th
by nsonha 3y ago
E-bikes are neither commute vehicles (not confortable to sit on) nor sport equipments (whose utility is to improve public health). They're just hobbyist tech thingies that contribute to e-waste. Why subsidise them?
Electric motorbike is another story, but I don't think they're that common in the developed world.
- relyks 3y agoAs someone who has an e-bike that's pedal assist, I have commuted 20 miles on a regular basis to work _because_ I'm able to with my e-bike. They enable you to get exercise and travel to a location much more easily over a regular bike. What is the main advantage of an e-bike over a regular bike for me? I'm able to climb tough hills that I wouldn't be able to otherwise.
- analog31 3y agoI commute on a conventional bike, but e-bikes have definitely expanded the acceptable distance for riding a bike to work, for a lot of people. Several of my work colleagues have gotten e-bikes for this purpose.
- timbit42 3y agoIf you want comfortable, look at recumbent trikes. Regarding e-waste, subsidize non-electric bike and trikes as well. Most of the electric motorbikes are limited to 25 mph so insurance and license are not required, but there are some that can do 35 mph and faster.