4 ms·
It sure sucks paying taxes and not getting separated and protected cycling lanes.
by 0xfaded 3y ago
It sure sucks paying taxes and not getting separated and protected cycling lanes.
- cscurmudgeon 3y agoWhat separate taxes do cyclists pay over gas tax and annual DMV taxes that car drivers pay? Shouldn’t cyclists pay their fair share for their usage? Why no DMV fee for cycles?
- sleepybrett 3y agoa bicycle doesn't wear the road like a car does. A bridge built for bicycles doesn't have to be built to carry so much weight and would be cheaper. Bicycle infrastructure is cheaper to build and maintain.
- Karrot_Kream 3y agoOn average only 41% of US roads are funded by a gas tax and only 53% are funded by some form of user fee, gas tax inclusive [1]. This formula varies per state. Cyclists subsidize road usage for drivers who use them much more, both because cars are much heavier and lead to increased wear and because drivers drive more miles and therefore put more wear on more roadway. It's a common myth that people believe US roads are solely or even mostly funded through user fees. [1]: https://taxfoundation.org/states-road-funding-2019/ https://taxfoundation.org/states-road-funding-2019/
- cscurmudgeon 3y ago> On average only 41% of US roads are funded by a gas tax and only 53% are funded by some form of user fee, gas tax inclusive [1] What about thousands in DMV fees? Your reference doesn’t cover that. Why does everyone ignore that? > It's a common myth that people believe US roads are solely or even mostly funded through user fees. Just repeating the same falsehood from biased sources doesn’t make it true. Once again give me a source with DMV fees.
- Karrot_Kream 3y agoLol come on. These fees are based on actual apportionments by the Federal government down to the states. DMV fees are probably made up in the "user fees" portion of the reference. These fees vary per state of course. > Just repeating the same falsehood from biased sources doesn’t make it true. "I don't believe you so your source is false." Okay so where are your alternate sources? According to the CA Legislative Analyst's Office [1], 63% of California roads were funded through user fees in 2022-2023. My above source reads 60% as of 2019. This tracks. So unless you think the CA State Government's own Legislative Analyst office is a "biased source", then these figures are probably broadly accurate. [1]: https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4628 https://lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/4628