What "wild claim" do you have in mind? The article seemed pretty clear about where evidence was lacking; and is more densely packed with links than >95% of mai

What "wild claim" do you have in mind? The article seemed pretty clear about where evidence was lacking; and is more densely packed with links than >95% of mainstream news articles. Even if one were to completely dismiss everything fta that was even slightly suspect, you'd still have more insight into why JP Morgan might intentionally delete tens of millions of emails. Forty-seven million emails. 47,000,000. "Accidentally". Even if you could believe this - wow - even if you could take that at face value, the fine worth ~45 minutes or so of profit is still preposterous.