> Well, you first need to get agreement from your language users on what constitutes "better". Removing the dynamism from a dynamic language does not make it "b

> Well, you first need to get agreement from your language users on what constitutes "better". Removing the dynamism from a dynamic language does not make it "better". I think that depends on if said dynamism is being intentionally used. Far too often it is not, and it gets even worse when that is paired with tools that do automated source code generation like the kinds Meta and Google use (or misuse depending on your definition).