4 ms·
Just to be clear, it's half a second for 256x256, where Stable Diffusion takes 3.2 seconds. Still a great speed-up, but not producing the big hi-res images peop
by interroboink 3y ago
Just to be clear, it's half a second for 256x256, where Stable Diffusion takes 3.2 seconds. Still a great speed-up, but not producing the big hi-res images people might be thinking of.
- barrkel 3y agoStable Diffusion takes 3.9 seconds to produce 8x 256x256 images (so about 0.5 seconds each), or 2 seconds to produce 1x 256x256 images. That's with DPM++ 2M Karras sampling with 20 iterations on a 3090.
- interroboink 3y agoI was just referring to the article with those numbers. See the "results" section, where they talk about their hardware and such, for apples-to-apples comparison.
- nkozyra 3y ago> Just to be clear, it's half a second for 256x256 But to continue their story, a lot of us used to play games at a 256x256 resolution. So in the grand scheme of "things improve quickly, by a lot" it very much applies.