3 ms·
I'm not sure you understood what I'm saying. My point is that the FDIC refunding more than 250k wasn't a bailout of the banks because FDIC insured banks are th
by gorjusborg 3y ago
I'm not sure you understood what I'm saying.
My point is that the FDIC refunding more than 250k wasn't a bailout of the banks because FDIC insured banks are the ones who fund the FDIC.
- gorjusborg 3y agoThe main point to take away is that healthy banks are on the hook for paying depositors through assessments charged by the FDIC.
- rcme 3y agoMy point is that the FDIC DIF premiums and assessments are mandated by law and are thus a tax levied on banks. So the you’re trying to make it seem like the banks are managing the risk themselves but another way of looking at it is that all FDIC operations are funded via tax revenue, just like everything else the government does. Ultimately, the FDIC is backed by the full faith and credit of the US.
- gorjusborg 3y ago> funded via tax revenue, just like everything else the government does FDIC assessments and taxes are different. You can over-simplify mentally to a tax, but that doesn't make it true. The FDIC runs more like an insurance provider than a run-of-the-mill government agency.
- rcme 3y agoSocial security and Medicare are also a form of insurance. Are you not paying a social security and Medicare tax? How is that different?