5 ms·

I’d like to know more about the principles of the “coalition made up of people who make adult entertainment” referenced in the article.

• deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
• humanistbot 3y ago
  I'm pretty sure they are porn actors, producers, and distributors whose principles are that they should be able to freely exercise their first amendment to perform, produce, and distribute porn. Is that a problem?
  • vuln 3y ago
    Should we allow the human trafficking that “feeds” their industry too?
    • _a_a_a_ 3y ago
      All industries have a bad side to them but I guess you honing hard on the sex and drugs industry. Fossil fuels might kill us, but who cares. Funny how consensual actions upset some Americans, but the most sadistic violence is just fine with them.
      • vuln 3y ago
        > Funny how consensual actions upset some Americans, but the most sadistic violence is just fine with them. Sorry. What part of human trafficking is consensual? Just trying to follow your logic here. > but the most sadistic violence is just fine with them. You seem to be projecting.
        • _a_a_a_ 3y ago
          > Sorry. What part of human trafficking is consensual? The article was about porn. Consensual porn. It was you that decided to deliberately taint it by dragging in human trafficking. Because you don't like porn and can't accept that sex outside a rigid framework should exist so you try to deny other people the right to be themselves or have their own lives their way. Elizabeth Henson has more guts and morals and decency than you.
          • vuln 3y ago
            > Consensual porn. Weird. I haven’t seen that category on the porn sites. > It was you that decided to deliberately taint it by dragging in human trafficking. Hmm. I’m sure 100% of _sex workers_ are there on their own free will. Right? > Because you don't like porn and can't accept that sex outside a rigid framework should exist so you try to deny other people the right to be themselves or have their own lives their way. I never said I didn’t like porn. Nor did I suggest a rigid framework. > Elizabeth Henson has more guts and morals and decency than you. You don’t know me, my morals or how decent I am. You instead project how you think I am based on you injecting words I didn’t say into a conversation. Weird flex.
            • _a_a_a_ 3y ago
              > Weird. I haven’t seen that category on the porn sites If you want to watch nonconsensual porn, I suggest you report yourself to the police. If you are unaware of a difference between consensual and nonconsensual porn, please report to a psychiatrist. > Hmm. I’m sure 100% of _sex workers_ are there on their own free will. Right? Right. But if you have any evidence that they are not, please report it to the police instead of complaining about it on a discussion forum. It is your legal and moral duty. > I never said I didn’t like porn. Nor did I suggest a rigid framework. Then explain what your position is and whether or not you actually do or don't like porn. Do you accept there is such thing as consensual workers in porn? If so, do you think they have a right to do their job? If not, why do you feel that you should control their employment prospects? Please answer the questions because there are so many people like you who pop up in sex and drugs discussions and simply try and kill them because you are unable to accept other people's autonomy. Again, please answer the questions so I can get some understanding of your worldview.
  • philwelch 3y ago
    I wouldn’t call that principle. I would call that economic self-interest.
• john011 3y ago
  [flagged]
• john012 3y ago
  [flagged]