nobody is claiming intentional deletion of the EXACT records being subpoenaed and only those records, and the article makes clear that isn't what happened the

nobody is claiming intentional deletion of the EXACT records being subpoenaed and only those records, and the article makes clear that isn't what happened the thing we're discussing is deleting A LOT of records which INCLUDE the ones being subpoenaed, which is obviously easily possible, intentionally or otherwise so, no stretch of the imagination required