It's a weird way to phrase it, but "local-first" is different than "local-only", which was my gut reaction to the phrase. I think as a flip over the remote-then

It's a weird way to phrase it, but "local-first" is different than "local-only", which was my gut reaction to the phrase. I think as a flip over the remote-then-sync model, it's apt, but could probably use some rebranding.