14 ms·
That sounds more like implicit atheism, which is a distinction within atheism, but still commonly defined as atheism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_and
by armada651 3y ago
That sounds more like implicit atheism, which is a distinction within atheism, but still commonly defined as atheism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_and_explicit_atheism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_and_explicit_atheism
- Dalewyn 3y agoImplicit atheism is still concerned with not believing in religion. The way I see atheism is that a belief in no religion is, by its nature, a religion. Joe is a christian and believes in Jesus, Bob is an atheist and believes no god; both are merely two sides of the same coin. You can't call yourself non-religious if you believe in a religion, whatever the specific form. Being non-religious means you don't care; it's not that you don't believe, you simply could not care less one way or another. Wikipedia appears to call it apatheism[1] and more broadly irreligion[2], but semantics aren't the focal issue here. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apatheism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apatheism [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion