3 ms·
I don't think this was intended as "physically hitting". The intent was "ignore what the kid is requesting, and communicate to them 'no you don't want that, it
by fifticon 3y ago
I don't think this was intended as "physically hitting".
The intent was "ignore what the kid is requesting, and communicate to them 'no you don't want that, it is wrong to want that'".
One way to do that would of course be to "hit", but the idea is about insisting that 'your view is right', and ignoring/not acknowledging the need the child is trying to communicate.
My point being, this can do almost as much damage, even if you are not 'hitting'.
Source: Am parent, was child.
It is hard living some problem, and then experiencing that the people who are in charge of taking care of you, consistently communicate "No, there is just something wrong with you, you don't want that/that isn't really a problem".
- brazzy 3y ago> I don't think this was intended as "physically hitting". I am very sure it was. In many parts of the world (including the USA) that is still completely accepted and normal.
- zarzavat 3y agoFYI “smack” is British English for American English “spank” and they are just about synonymous, modulo cultural differences on what kind of smacking/spanking is acceptable.