> It seems to me much more about group incentives than some nefarious lockstep plan. Yes, probably, but isn’t this worse? Group incentives favour those that al

> It seems to me much more about group incentives than some nefarious lockstep plan. Yes, probably, but isn’t this worse? Group incentives favour those that already have capital (material and political), which creates a feedback-loop increasing the rich-poor divide until… what exactly? What’s the end-state? A return to feudalism? Bloody revolution? It just seems like there was a “once upon a time” where politics was about “this is the society we want”, and they tried to build it. Now it seems we’ve all just given up. Meaningless! Meaningless! Let’s deconstruct society until we can argue that a future of 1% home ownership is somehow better.