4 ms·
It’s probably easier to use than COM on windows. The other interesting thing about it was that because of the message passing and easily inspectable objc_methna
by zer0zzz 3y ago
It’s probably easier to use than COM on windows. The other interesting thing about it was that because of the message passing and easily inspectable objc_methname sections in the macho it was probably super easy for those early
iPhone app coders to write some early apps before apple even shipped their first AppStore and iPhone OS 2.0 sdk.
- pjmlp 3y agoCOM is great as idea. Unfortunately WinDev is so siloed into their way of thinking that never managed to create productive tooling. The exceptions being VB 6, .NET Native and C++/CX. It is somehow tragic that Delphi and C++ Builder are the most long lived toolchains that offer usable productivity with COM, and Microsoft itself is unable to keep productive tooling for COM going.