3 ms·
The change I suggested is backwards compatible - probably a relatively small change to a single method in parsing. You, on the other hand, took the pre-existin
by yarg 3y ago
The change I suggested is backwards compatible - probably a relatively small change to a single method in parsing.
You, on the other hand, took the pre-existing syntax and contemptuously threw it out the window - and completely ignored the advantage of widespread tacit understanding.
- throwaway744678 3y agoDon't sweat it, it was a joke (turning your sample into LISP)
- yarg 3y agoSorry, I haven't spent any time with LISP. I do however want to write a dialect of it, though mostly for the sake of naming it 'Lithp'.
- bad_login 3y agoHere is the racket view of xml https://docs.racket-lang.org/sxml/SXML.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/sxml/SXML.html more examples: https://docs.racket-lang.org/sxml/ssax.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/sxml/ssax.html and then you can manipulate your sxml with https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/match.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/match.html