I kind of see your point at the macro level, but in our case we are both working in the same product, and contributing to the same bottom line. I see no strateg

I kind of see your point at the macro level, but in our case we are both working in the same product, and contributing to the same bottom line. I see no strategic advantage on shifting resources from a high to a low performing team. And of course the triple whammy happens when low quality software written by one team is handed over to a better team to fix it. I'm going through that right now. We have an upstream dependency that it's always causing all sorts of trouble. We've been told by leadership that if we notice issues we should go fix them ourselves rather than asking the other team to fix it. Go back to the incentives, what message are we sending the other team?