4 ms·
Fingers crossed there is no network issue. `time.sleep(5)` is ridiculous.
by gnulinux 3y ago
Fingers crossed there is no network issue. `time.sleep(5)` is ridiculous.
- peteradio 3y agoThen just time.sleep(10) bro, it aint rocket science.
- tarruda 3y agoI would use time.sleep(60) just in case.
- peteradio 3y agotime.sleep(300) allows for a smoke break per sync, please consider my PR
- edvinbesic 3y agoThat depends on what you're smoking, let's just be safe: time.sleep(3600)
- intelVISA 3y agoEntire field of distributed systems solved by this one trick!