> A debate about this would never end. Which is why the whole thing needs to be nipped in the bud. For one thing .meta would already be a dotfile so .dotfile/

> A debate about this would never end. Which is why the whole thing needs to be nipped in the bud. For one thing .meta would already be a dotfile so .dotfile/.env would be redundant. But that's called dotenv! What's it going to be named now? Or maybe that wouldn't be included. But it's on the list in the tweet linked to in the article.