3 ms·
Sure, but their gonads don't produce eggs. They're socially female and in many ways physically female, but from a reproductive perspective (the reason for sexu
by yarg 3y ago
Sure, but their gonads don't produce eggs.
They're socially female and in many ways physically female, but from a reproductive perspective (the reason for sexual dimorphism in the first place) they're not female.
They're males with transformative hormonal disorders.
Also, arguments regarding legitimate medical issues like this and CAIS are completely orthogonal to the ideological reason behind the caveat on the article.
- _thisdot 3y agoI’m sorry, it’s not clear to me who you’re talking about
- yarg 3y agoThen we both get to be confused by each other's comments.
- eozoon 3y agoThe article is talking about colorectal cancer and bladder cancer, y chromosome owners can get those cancers too whether or not they have female phenotype or not.
- yarg 3y agoI was replying to a subject forked sub-thread, so what I said isn't directly applicable to the article.
- fzeroracer 3y agoSo by your own argument, are men that are infertile not men, then? If so, then I believe we have quite the reckoning with how many people think they're men when they're not.
- yarg 3y agoThey're not complete men. They're the whimper at the end of a 4,000,000,000 year long bloodline (I say blood). Our ability to replicate is and ever has been and will remain the primary guiding factor of our evolution. The meek be damned, it's the fertile who shall inherit the earth.