4 ms·
What a brain dead reply. So violence is fine because it's not as bad as some other horrific events in the past? The barometer shouldn't be the frequency of vio
by infamouscow 3y ago
What a brain dead reply.
So violence is fine because it's not as bad as some other horrific events in the past? The barometer shouldn't be the frequency of violence reaching a certain threshold. It's should be zero for everyone.
You should genuinely be embarrassed at this remarkably stupid and pathetic distinction.
- somewhereoutth 3y agoThe point is that the threat cannot be real (to the class as a whole). Indeed, it is hard to consider it real to an individual, unless you think there are gangs of women going around beating up men just for being men. Surely you can see the distinction between a real and possible threat, that might genuinely put fear into the object class, and words that can never be actioned? "Kill all men" might as well say "beware of the vicious rabbit"
- infamouscow 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depp_v._Heard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depp_v._Heard
- somewhereoutth 3y ago> The juror stated that he found that Depp and Heard "were both abusive to each other" but that Heard's team failed to prove that Depp's abuse was physical. Not sure how any of that substantiates whatever point it is you are trying to make. Unless making allegations of violence is now considered violence itself?