4 ms·
Because both sexes are required for the species to survive. Killing all men would mean the end of all women too.
by breakyerself 3y ago
Because both sexes are required for the species to survive. Killing all men would mean the end of all women too.
- yarg 3y ago[flagged]
- yowlingcat 3y ago[flagged]
- yarg 3y agoWe've been (I say we) sexually reproducing for over 1,000,000,000 years. And yet somehow we've reached the point where if you acknowledge human sexual dimorphism, you're a fascist. It's a damned weird ideology, and if it doesn't go away it should at least be acknowledged as a religion.
- breakyerself 3y agoAcknowledging how things are isn't fascism. Imposing your ideas about how things should be in a way that harms trans people is fascist.
- breakyerself 3y agoHey nice hyperbolic strawman you've got there. It's actually the opposite. Transphobes think sex is interchangeable and can be imposed from the outside. The rest of us think gender comes from the inside and simply believe in loving and supporting people regardless of how THEY express their own gender. People like you want to impose an external concept of gender onto trans people that doesn't comport with their self image. You want to forgo the medical science and drive trans people into depression and suicide because the idea of it makes you feel yucky.
- type0 3y agoThe goal is parthenogenesis, I think Seksmisja movie is prophetic in some sense
- nyokodo 3y ago> Killing all men would mean the end of all women too. There is some percentage of “feminists” who don’t love women but simply hate men.
- arp242 3y agoThere is some percentage of $x who hate $y for almost any value and combination of $x ad $y. It's not meaningful or constructive to look at the extreme nutjob examples when examining a movement in its entirety.
- dumpsterdiver 3y agoI completely disagree. As you know, the extreme nut job examples are always the loudest people in the group. It is not meaningless to account for them.
- arp242 3y agoI agree many have an apparent outsized influence, but with some exceptions in most cases I think this is only optics, and they don't really represent all that many people. "280 character soundbite" social media isn't helping either here, nor is "zomg person X said something ridiculous"-type "journalism".
- tbrownaw 3y agoWell, someone did seriously suggest getting rid of 90% of men, and invented a fairly popular slogan in the process. "The future -- if there is one -- is female" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Miller_Gearhart