4 ms·
Both Next and Vercel are fantastic. I've used Next for multiple projects and it's part of my go-to stack now. Why are you promoting someone complaining about n
by stevebmark 3y ago
Both Next and Vercel are fantastic. I've used Next for multiple projects and it's part of my go-to stack now. Why are you promoting someone complaining about not understanding it? This person is a troll who is conflating learning new technology for it being bad. I also don't understand how "opinionated" is the source of the complaint - what framework isn't opinionated?
- solardev 3y ago> what framework isn't opinionated Vanilla React, for one. When it came out, it was way less opinionated than Angular, being only a UI lib and not a full framework per se. But people kept trying to use it like a full framework, and ended up creating things like React Router and Redux and a bazillion other routing and state and SSR etc. solutions. It was a nightmare. React apps from that era are totally unreadable and hard to reason about. It wasn't until Next that a React project could actually feel sane and organized, with sensible defaults controlled by one party instead of a million overwhelming packages from twenty different companies you'd have to mix and match. Especially when used with Vercel, I agree, it's quite astonishing how much better it is than the stuff we lived with the last two decades. Hell, even the official React docs now recommend using Next instead of Vanilla. That's how much better of an improvement it is...