> The argument is also questionable in general, because why bring up children segregated and then force "diversity" later? Are you claiming people who are pro-

> The argument is also questionable in general, because why bring up children segregated and then force "diversity" later? Are you claiming people who are pro-diversity (in adults) are also pro-child-segregation? Or just that they are indifferent to it? If it's the latter, isn't it analogous to asking "I see you're raising funds for a chemotherapy charity, but why aren't you raising awareness for frequent screening and early detection?"