4 ms·
I don't agree with this at all. I do concede that some of these patterns use manipulation and visual trickery to send you down a particular (typically more prof
by parentheses 3y ago
I don't agree with this at all. I do concede that some of these patterns use manipulation and visual trickery to send you down a particular (typically more profitable) path. That said, we all enjoy these services for free. The companies that provide them are for profit. I feel the intense hatred people have for these companies is extremely biased.
As a person who avoids Meta products for the most part, I still benefit from them greatly. I pay $0 and get a lot of conveniences. I do agree that it's not a nice feeling that they own the things I may post, but it's the deal that gets us what's app, facebook and instagram with near unlimited access to really nice social networking tools.
I similarly pay for YouTube premium because I don't want adds. I enjoy hours of video content ad free - often watching it more than I'd watch netflix or whatever other streaming service.
I agree that they're monetizing user content, but they're also providing access to compelling and often high quality content for free.
- spuz 3y agoThe "fuck you" isn't that they require you to login in order to view a page. It's that they tease you with the promise that you don't need an account, and when you try to take them up on that promise they slam the door in your face and say "nice try but you gotta create an account first".