4 ms·
It cites multiple studies though. E.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367209/ Just because
by edgyquant 3y ago
It cites multiple studies though. E.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4367209/
Just because there are not currently any FDA approved medicines doesn’t mean it isn’t science. I also would push back at anyone asserting government approval is required for science to be accurate.
- piyushpr134 3y ago100%. FDA approval is nonsense. FDA plays in arms of big pharma to provide you good advice which also makes money. They hardly peddle any advice which doesn't make money. For instance, linkage of cancer, heart disease, kidney disease etc with processed foods, sugar, fructose (fruit juice, corn syrup) etc despite tonnes of contrary evidence
- wswope 3y agoNah bro, this is just like all rare cancers and orphan diseases, which are also fake. If they were real, the FDA would be on top of that. Get a load of this literature review on the gut brain axis from pages 88-137, 49 pages listing over 1694 totally bogus citations: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/physrev.00018.2018?download=true https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/physrev.0001.... There's clearly no epistemological basis for this stuff! (\s)