5 ms·
Why? Kids probably cause more property damage than pets do. Seems reasonable IMO.
by warning26 3y ago
Why? Kids probably cause more property damage than pets do. Seems reasonable IMO.
- logicchains 3y agoAnd the people arguing for white-only spaces said whites caused less property damage than certain other races.
- decremental 3y ago[dead]
- warning26 3y agoAnd that’s related how? Choosing to have a kid (or a pet) is a choice, while race isn’t. Seems to me that’s a pretty major distinction.
- jxidjhdhdhdhfhf 3y agoChoosing to have a kid is a choice of the parents, not the child. You're forgetting the child is also a person, one as deserving of the same civil rights as anyone else, at least where we can give them without causing harm to the child.
- Dma54rhs 3y agoAre these serious opinions? I'm sure in America they said to black folk having kids is a choice as well - you can skip the discrimination by not having a new generation.
- mcphage 3y agoBeing a child is not a choice. No-kid zones ban children, not parents.
- jxidjhdhdhdhfhf 3y agoIt's cheaper to have no disability access than to have it. It's probably cheaper to exclude poor, black people from your property. Too bad, when you live in a society, you have to deal with other people living in the society including those under the age of 18.